If it is appropriate for people who don't approve of him calling her a slut to put social pressure on him, isn't equally appropriate for him to use social pressure on her if he doesn't approve of her demanding we hand over the fruits of our labor so her law school friends can have sex without getting pregnant?
- One objection, obviously, is he is a public figure and she isn't. That's a red herring, though; she deliberately injected herself into public discourse by making her demands at a congressional hearing. That makes her a public figure.
- Another objection might be that he is getting paid and she is doing it for public-spiritedness. If you look at her resume, though, that objection fails, too. Given her past work and intended career, this appearance (and controversy!) will--beyond any doubt--promote both her status and career prospects, with predictable financial return. So yes, Rush is benefiting personally, but so is she.
- A feminist might object that he's a man and she's a woman and the comment reflects some kind of gender dominance play. Yeah right, a student at Georgetown Law (with a connection to the former Speaker of the House, no less) talking about someone taking away her power. A future member of the 1% whining about threats to her personal autonomy. Cry me a river.
But is there any difference, really, between the people talking for pressure on Rush and him calling for pressure on her? I don't see anyone occupying the moral high ground here, just a bunch of people equally getting mad about someone else saying something they don't like.
Am I wrong?
To answer your question, nope. You are not wrong.
ReplyDeleteUnfortunately morality has left the building.
I still hold to my argument that it is not about birth control and who pays for it or not. That's just a distraction.
What is at issue is the State imposing on the Church.
This does seem to be an activists approach to further support Obama's imposition of the birth control in Obamacare throwing us one step closer to a socialist America.
Peer pressure does not stop as we age or become famous.
I am certain that even Rick Santorum practices a form of birth control, formally known as the rhythm method. Anyone with basic knowledge of reproductive cycles and life expectancies of the sperm and eggs, and decided not to engage in sexual activity during that time practices birth control, Catholic or not.
The issue is the infringement on the First Amendment. Without the Bill of Rights, the Constitution would not have had the support of all those holdouts who were necessary to ratify it.
The definition of character is what you do when no one is watching.